“Engagement” and “dialogue” have not always been words associated with U.S.-Cuba relations. But, if recent reports in the media are any indication, that may be changing. Today, NAFSA sent a letter to the Los Angeles Times in response to a July 28 article, US takes down provocative billboard in Havana , which characterized the removal of a billboard at the U.S. Interests Section building in Havana as a symbol of growing cooperation between the United States and Cuba.
Here’s NAFSA’s letter:
To the Editor:
President Obama’s decision to shut down the news ticker at the U.S. diplomatic mission in Havana (US takes down provocative billboard in Havana , July 28) reflects his understanding of the need to emphasize respectful engagement and dialogue in our communications with the people of other countries. A State Department spokesperson noted that the administration did not feel that the billboard was helpful to the administration’s goal of “increasing the free flow of information” to the Cuban people.
We hope the president will now take another step toward engaging the Cuban people that would be truly transformative: the lifting of current restrictions on academic travel. This action is vital at this stage in the “reset” of U.S. relations with Cuba. Academic exchanges are among the best and most proven tools we can use to build ties of understanding, create the conditions for democratic change, and advance efforts to improve relations between our two countries. Face-to-face exchanges across nations and cultures, as the president himself has said, “can break down walls between us.” It’s time to lift the ban on academic travel and restore the flow of knowledge, ideas, and people between the United States and Cuba.
Victor C. Johnson
Senior Advisor, Public Policy
Just last week, NAFSA and 17 diverse organizations came together to send a letter to President Obama, asking him to build on the important steps he took earlier this year to renew U.S. relations with Cuba by lifting restrictions on academic travel.
Want to send a letter of your own? Visit NAFSA’s Media Guide in the Take Action Center to find out how.
We are attempting to develop a short-term graduate program that focuses on efficient community public health health delivery in Cuba. Cuba has long been a recognized leader in this area. As the US moves toward seriously rethinking health care, preventative care, and cost effectiveness, it makes sense to expose practicing and future health care leaders to different programs and methodologies. Unfortunately, the current restrictions make studying and sending students to Cuba extraordinarily difficult, expensive, and highly limiting. By lifting the ban on educational exchanges, we will foster the free exchange of ideas, methods and relationships. There is little doubt in my mind that the US will benefit greatly from remaining free or restrictions and limitations, particularly with respect to Cuba.
While it is a pain in the neck, and may prove to be unnecessary, universities and others with potential non-tourist programs should file applications with OFAC.
It appears that a pro-licensing tendency is in force even if not publicly announced, per this article http://ticc.blogspot.com/2009/08/by-david-adams-times-latin-america.html
Most importantly, I believe the White House is on the verge of announcing licenses for non-tourist travel, as it had originally planned to do in April.
To offset the influence of opponents of educational travel like Senator Menendez, please let the White House know how you feel about its delay through the web site of the Office of Public Engagement http://www.whitehouse.gov/ope/contact/
John McAuliff
Fund for Reconciliation and Development
Cool site, love the info.